<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another black eye for shareware</title>
	<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/</link>
	<description>a community for independent software developers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 03:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: free norton antivirus</title>
		<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-1240</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-1240</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;free norton antivirus&lt;/strong&gt;
Spyware doctor  panda antivirus, human viruses  free virus scan. Spyware free  free antivirus, spybot search  free virus scan. Free virus protection  spybot download, free norton antivirus  spyware doctor. Free spyware  spyware stormer, free removal of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>free norton antivirus</strong><br />
Spyware doctor  panda antivirus, human viruses  free virus scan. Spyware free  free antivirus, spybot search  free virus scan. Free virus protection  spybot download, free norton antivirus  spyware doctor. Free spyware  spyware stormer, free removal of&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave S.</title>
		<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-135</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-135</guid>
					<description>I've had plenty of good experiences buying downloadable shareware. I rarely bat an eye going through Kagi etc. for a $40 app that I've heard good things about. And that's part of the reason I felt compelled to write up my Adobe experience, because the little guys have nailed it where Adobe has not.

To be fair though, I maintain I'd rather have physical media than rely on anyone's license recovery methods. Those serial numbers are just too easy to lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had plenty of good experiences buying downloadable shareware. I rarely bat an eye going through Kagi etc. for a $40 app that I&#8217;ve heard good things about. And that&#8217;s part of the reason I felt compelled to write up my Adobe experience, because the little guys have nailed it where Adobe has not.</p>
<p>To be fair though, I maintain I&#8217;d rather have physical media than rely on anyone&#8217;s license recovery methods. Those serial numbers are just too easy to lose.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Curnow</title>
		<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-128</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-128</guid>
					<description>This is more an indictment on Brick-and-Morter e-Commerce than it is of the shareware industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is more an indictment on Brick-and-Morter e-Commerce than it is of the shareware industry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-66</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2004 18:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-66</guid>
					<description>The post starts with him saying that he prefers to not buy downloadable software and his experiences reinforce why this is the case.  While the Adobe store may not be selling shareware, they are using a model that is similar enough to what shareware developers are doing that his post can be considered a negative for the shareware industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post starts with him saying that he prefers to not buy downloadable software and his experiences reinforce why this is the case.  While the Adobe store may not be selling shareware, they are using a model that is similar enough to what shareware developers are doing that his post can be considered a negative for the shareware industry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Curnow</title>
		<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-65</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-65</guid>
					<description>How is this a black eye for Shareware?  Shrinkware?  Yes, but it's certainly not shareware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this a black eye for Shareware?  Shrinkware?  Yes, but it&#8217;s certainly not shareware.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tony Edgecombe</title>
		<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-63</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-63</guid>
					<description>I decided not to buy from them when I discovered the UK download was 40% more expensive than the US one. Where exactly do the extra costs come from for the UK?

Adobe's doesn't seem to age very well, every version of Acrobat I have used has been worse than the previous one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided not to buy from them when I discovered the UK download was 40% more expensive than the US one. Where exactly do the extra costs come from for the UK?</p>
<p>Adobe&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t seem to age very well, every version of Acrobat I have used has been worse than the previous one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-62</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.microisv.com/archives/2004/12/23/blackeye/#comment-62</guid>
					<description>Phil Windley just had similar problems with Adobe:
http://www.windley.com/2004/12/22.html#a1586

It appears that their site (and code) could use a little work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Windley just had similar problems with Adobe:<br />
<a href='http://www.windley.com/2004/12/22.html#a1586' rel='nofollow'>http://www.windley.com/2004/12/22.html#a1586</a></p>
<p>It appears that their site (and code) could use a little work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
